• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Jon Luskin, CFP® ● Hourly Advice for Do-It-Yourself Investors

Hourly Advice for Do-It-Yourself Investors

  • Home
  • About
  • Work with Jon
  • Blog
  • Bogleheads® Live
  • Publications
  • Speaking
  • Reading List

Why Invest in Bonds Today?

November 23, 2020 By Jon Luskin 6 Comments

What is the case for investing in high-quality fixed-income? With interest rates at historic lows, many investors are shunning low-yielding United States Treasuries. Is this the right investment move?

It depends.

The case for holding bonds depends on your view of a bond’s role in your investment portfolio.

So, why do we own bonds? I can think of a couple of reasons:

  • to generate portfolio income
  • to help manage the risk of stocks

Table of Contents

  • Do We Own Bonds for Income?
  • Bonds Offer Better Safety of Principal
  • Interest Rate Risk
  • Inflation Risk

Do We Own Bonds for Income?

One could hold bonds for their income generation. That’s because – STRIPS aside – fixed income investments usually pay a coupon.

Short, intermediate and long-term Treasuries minus CPI
Total real return on Treasuries by maturity, 1926-2019

Unfortunately, bond coupons have been paltry of late – to the disappointment of bonds-for-income investors. (Of course, with recent interest rate increases, that’s changed some.)

Low interest rates are quite distinct from history. In the time since the senior generation of investment advisors have been practicing, intermediate-term Treasuries have been able to outperform inflation: Treasuries offered a real return. This was because of both a historically-higher coupon and principal appreciation from decreasing interest rates.

Decreasing interest rates have provided the opportunity to seize on capital appreciation in the bond space, i.e., “rolling down the curve.”

That trend may be changing: the real return on bonds has been steadily decreasing since the late 1980s. With interest rates at only now just off their historic lows, bonds offer relatively small coupons and have little room for appreciation. (In fact, depreciation of bonds has been a big concern for investors.)

Alternatives to Get Income

In short, bonds are paying less real income than before. Given the decreasing investment returns of bond, investors and advisors alike are re-thinking traditional bond allocations; they are looking elsewhere for income. This has given rise to numerous alternatives to traditional fixed-income allocations, including

  • high-yield (i.e. junk) bonds – despite their risk and inferior performance when paired with stocks to create a diversified portfolio;
  • increasing a portfolio’s equity allocation (“75/25 is the new 60/40”) – again, risky;
  • allocating to dividend-paying stocks – despite the strategy’s fallacy; and
  • allocating to alternatives – despite the high fees and inconsistent performance.
As interest rates drop, investors are fleeing traditional bond allocations in favor of lower-grade bonds, greater equity weightings, and alternative assets.

In short, it’s hard to make a case for holding bonds based on the income generation feature alone; the income is no longer there.

Income is a Smaller, Less Tax-Efficient, But Stabler Investment Return

Speaking of income, what exactly is “income” anyway? Income is just a type of investment return, albeit (usually) a more stable, but less tax-efficient investment return than what is available with stock appreciation, real estate appreciation, etc. (“Usually,” because sometimes bonds underperform. A bond default can mean no income, and a poor investment return.)

Stock proxy (SPY) outperforming a bond proxy (TLT) on a relatively longer timeline.

Of course, such stability has a price: it’s no surprise that the investment return available with fixed-income is usually less than what can be had with stock market investing. At least, that’s the case more frequently when on relatively longer timelines. (And of course, the longer the timeline, the greater the frequency of stock market outperformance.)

Feature/Asset ClassStocksBonds
Income GenerationSometimesUsually
AppreciationUsuallySometimes
Tax EfficiencyYesNo
Safety of PrincipalNoUsually
Features of the stock and bond asset classes.

So, if we’re solely interested in an investment return – and nothing else – we would own stocks – and not bonds. That’s because stocks are better at providing an investment return than bonds – on average. However, while stocks do it better, bonds may be able to do it more consistently (but – as already mentioned – less tax-efficiently).

Bonds Offer Better Safety of Principal

You don’t need to read this to know that high-quality bonds – interest rate movements aside – are relatively safer investments than stocks, real estate, or alternatives. Whatsmore, bonds don’t need to generate income to offer that relative safety of principal. (Of course, all else being equal, receiving coupons is arguably better than not – tax inefficiency aside.) But, regardless of the size of the coupon payment, high-quality fixed income better manages the risk of stocks compared to alternatives – or even different types of stocks.

Given all this – that you don’t need interest payments from bonds to benefit from their relatively stability compared to stocks – it could be argued: it’s the relative safety of principal – and not the income – that makes the case for investing in bonds.

The relatively stable investment return (both any now-nominal coupon and relative stability of principal) of high-quality fixed-income exists as a diversifier against other riskier investments (stocks, real estate, or even alternatives). Said another way, just because high-quality bonds no longer pay a real coupon doesn’t mean it doesn’t make sense to still hold bonds! Of course, you still have to believe that high-quality bonds do indeed still offer some safety of principal given today’s interest rates.

Staying Focused on the Role of Bonds

High-quality bonds function as a better store of value than stocks – at least in the relatively shorter term. (Again, this turns a blind eye to the interest rate issue – which I promise I will get to farther down in this post. Just stay with me!) Of course, in the shortest term – where inflation is a non-issue – cash is the best store of value.

Bonds offer stability of principal somewhere between cash (most stable) and stocks (less stable).

The Fallacy of Investing for Income

So, by now it could be argued that it’s quite clear that – as a portfolio diversifier – the value of bonds is in their relative stability of principal and not their coupon payment. Why is the stability of principal so important? To put the value of principal stability into perspective, consider the mindset (already touched on) of investing in dividend-paying stocks for the dividend. That strategy doesn’t work well for the investor who sees their principal investment (the stock price) decrease.

So, while it’s nice to receive a small cash dividend, the value of that dividend is dwarfed by the risk of principal loss. In short, the safety of principal is a big deal – with it having a big impact on total return. Investors who buy dividend-paying stocks for a 2% yield will likely be disappointed when a global pandemic cuts the value of their portfolio by more than 45%!

In short, the logic of investing for a coupon or a dividend – without looking at the safety of principal is short-sighted; that cash distribution is just a small part of the equation.

The Immeasurable Value of Bonds

In The Psychology of Money, Morgan Housel proposes that the true value of an emergency fund is immeasurable – and far beyond the paltry 1% a savings account may be paying. That’s because – he argues – that having cash savings prevents investors from having to sell stocks at a loss. Or, having a cash emergency fund prevents consumers from taking on personal loans at double-digit interest rates. So, while technically the interest rate on a savings account is small, it’s true value in preventing other poor money decisions from being made is immeasurable.

It’s the same with bonds. While yields near 0% or 1% look unattractive, the true value of bonds is immeasurable. That’s because bonds need not be examined in isolation, but in the contribution to – and impact on – the total investment portfolio.

Modern Portfolio Theory

Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) argues for pairing assets will low correlation to achieve the optimum risk-adjusted portfolio return. And pairing (certain) bonds with stocks does just that! The risk-reducing nature of U.S. Treasuries allows investors to do better when bonds are paired with stocks.

Look no further than the recent COVID-inspired market rout to see this in action: stocks go down, and Treasuries (on average) go up.

During the COVID-prompted stock market rout, Treasuries rallied when U.S. stocks declined.

So, we could argue that we own bonds not because they offer income, but because they help us construct the best portfolio. Whether or not the income is there, the relative stability of principal is.

By this logic, if bonds – especially Treasury bonds, despite their low yield – still provide valuable protection against stocks, then it still makes sense to own bonds – especially Treasuries – today.

Interest Rate Risk

As promised: no argument for investing in bonds would be complete without touching on both risks of rising interest rates and the risk of inflation.

I’m fortunate enough to have been in the investment management space for seven years. And even since my early days in the field, advisors have been terrified of rising interest rates. Then – as with now – it may be a mistake to shun intermediate-term bonds because of the fear of rising interest rates. Is it really different this time?

Intermediate Treasuries outperformed shorter-term Treasuries amidst investor fears of rising interest rates.

The Risk of Short-Term Bonds

Whatsmore, it’s not just the coupon you’re giving up when forgoing the term premium; investors shunning the term premium give up the pop (from negative correlation) that longer-term Treasuries provide when stock market rout. Shorter-term Treasuries offer diversification against stock market volatility. (If you have a relatively smaller stock allocation – and relatively large allocation to Treasuries – then shorter-term Treasuries may do the job.)

Average crisis alpha by index, 1/1/88 – 2/29/2020. Not to scale.

Inflation Risk

Could unanticipated inflation eat away at the return of fixed income, especially in today’s interest rate environment, and most especially on the smaller coupons of the higher-quality Treasuries? Of course!

That’s why famed endowment manager David F. Swensen recommends holding not just intermediate nominal Treasury bonds, but Treasury inflation-protected securities (TIPS) as well. A 50/50 mix of nominal Treasuries and Treasury inflation-protected securities (TIPS) for a fixed income allocation allows TIPS to outperform given unexpected inflation, with nominal bonds outperforming if inflation is lower than the market priced into the securities.

This simple 50% nominal Treasuries and 50% TIPS allocation allows investors to hedge their fixed-income portfolios against inflation.

The Swensen portfolio hedges against unexpected inflation with the use of Treasury inflation-protected securities (TIPS).

So, what do you think? Do high-quality bonds still deserve a place in your investment portfolio? If so, why – and what type of bonds? If not, why not?

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Is a One-Day Financial Review Right for You?

Get Your Free Assessment ➔

Get in Touch with Jon Luskin, CFP®

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Sign Up for New Blog Posts & Podcasts Delivered to Your Inbox

What I’m Reading Right Now

Recent Posts

  • Bogleheads® Live 40: Sean Mullaney on Recent Tax Law Changes for FIRE
  • Bogleheads® Live 39: Protecting Your Income
  • Bogleheads® Live 38: Medicare Questions Answered
  • Bogleheads® Live 37: Christine Benz on ‘How much can I spend in retirement?’
  • Bogleheads® Live 36: Mike Piper on ‘After the Death of Your Spouse’

Categories

  • Bogleheads® Live
  • Bonds
  • College Planning
  • Financial Planning
  • FIRE, FI, Early Retirement
  • Investing
  • Practice Management
  • Real Estate Investing
  • Tax Planning

Jon Luskin, CFP® Follow

Hourly Advice for Do-It-Yourself Investors. '@Bogleheads® Live' host. Advice-Only #CFP®. #fiduciary. @SDFLC volunteer. Tweets ≠ Advice. https://t.co/GJqMxem3Cr

JonLuskin
jonluskin Jon Luskin, CFP® @jonluskin ·
10 Feb

How to Buy Life #Insurance: Laddering Life Insurance Policies

Instead of buying a single life insurance policy with a term similar to the balance of your working career and the total coverage needed were you to die tomorrow, you could consider laddering policies.

1/n

Reply on Twitter 1624151247186976776 Retweet on Twitter 1624151247186976776 Like on Twitter 1624151247186976776 4 Twitter 1624151247186976776
Retweet on Twitter Jon Luskin, CFP® Retweeted
bogleheads John C Bogle Center for Financial Literacy @bogleheads ·
10 Feb

Mark your calendars for Thursday, 12:00 p.m. Pacific / 3:00 p.m. Eastern.

Will be answering your questions about the critical insurance coverage that is disability #insurance.

Set a reminder for my upcoming Space! https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1OyKAVAlnXqGb

Reply on Twitter 1624088094415933440 Retweet on Twitter 1624088094415933440 1 Like on Twitter 1624088094415933440 1 Twitter 1624088094415933440
jonluskin Jon Luskin, CFP® @jonluskin ·
10 Feb

It’s hard to make a case for any life #insurance that isn’t term life insurance.

Said differently:

Generally, run screaming from whole life, universal life, indexed universal life (IUL), variable life, variable universal life, or anything not term life insurance.

Reply on Twitter 1624060620948529154 Retweet on Twitter 1624060620948529154 1 Like on Twitter 1624060620948529154 37 Twitter 1624060620948529154
Load More

Is the One-Day Financial Review right for you?


Get Your Free Assessment ➔

Disclosures & Legal

Jon Luskin is a registered investment adviser in the states of Arizona, California, Florida, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and Washington. The Adviser may not transact business in states where it is not appropriately registered, excluded or exempted from registration. Currently, there are no states where the adviser is not appropriately registered, excluded or exempted from registration – allowing the adviser to work with anyone in any state. Individualized responses to persons that involve either the effecting of transaction in securities, or the rendering of personalized investment advice for compensation, will not be made without registration or exemption.

Copyright © 2023